🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document offers a flawed view of the European Union. The document asserts that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" agendas represent an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this perspective is based on a serious misinterpretation of the situation. The true challenge facing Europe is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Economic Gap Between the US and Europe

The data paint a sobering contrast. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by eighty-seven percent, compared to a paltry 13.5% growth for the EU. Over this period, EU GDP per capita fell from over three-quarters to just half of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than major EU nations like France and Italy.

Currently, about 50% of the global 50 largest technology firms are US-based, while only four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Question

The growing disparity stems from superior productivity growth in the US, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology dominance is decidedly American. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at more than $10bn, compared with only fourteen in the European continent.

This gap raises a vital question: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, what is Europe positioned? Most analysts concede it is essentially a contest between two between the US and China, with Europe starting at a significant handicap.

Root Causes of Europe's Innovation Gap

Several major reasons account for this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a much more robust and agile system for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a true unified investment market, a factor that limits the growth potential of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided rules hinder European business. A US startup can introduce a service under a single set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 separate regimes, creating significant internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these hurdles, there are reasons for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have started to propose serious reform. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market point to the necessity of sweeping changes.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths could support far greater degrees of commercial innovation.

The continent retains considerable advantages: high-quality human capital, top-tier schools and universities, and world-class research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these foundations have the potential to unleash a surge of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in creating next-generation technologies, it can still dramatically increase productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

Europe now faces a decisive crossroads. As the saying goes, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, Europe's technological decline has been steady. However, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of global economic relevance.