🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are considering similar bans.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to approve a bill lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," stated the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the government has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by strong data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. An organization set up by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful platform posts contends that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a leading peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further use needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures mandating guardian approval for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain politicians to copy this lead, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond these regions, additional nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The agency points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

While this international discussion continues, the steps of the Australian government and its followers indicate that states around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.